CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Alterna
MCC 0.586 > 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.526 ± 0.176 > 0.484 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.529 > 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.659 > 0.609
Total TP 201 > 173
Total TN 31826 < 31847
Total FP 107 < 113
Total FP CONTRA 15 = 15
Total FP INCONS 89 < 96
Total FP COMP 3 > 2
Total FN 179 < 207
P-value 2.50323628132e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Alterna. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Alterna. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Alterna).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 201
Total TN 31826
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 179
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.526 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.529
Positive Predictive Value 0.659
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 621 3 0 3 0 13
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 173
Total TN 31847
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 207
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.455
Positive Predictive Value 0.609
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AM1_B - 0.61 0.57 0.67 20 3210 10 1 9 0 15
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.