CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Mastr(20)
MCC 0.548 > 0.471
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.085 > 0.406 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.484 > 0.305
Positive Predictive Value 0.626 < 0.734
Total TP 578 > 364
Total TN 239594 < 240022
Total FP 419 > 145
Total FP CONTRA 44 > 11
Total FP INCONS 302 > 121
Total FP COMP 73 > 13
Total FN 616 < 830
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Mastr(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Mastr(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 578
Total TN 239594
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 302
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 616
Total Scores
MCC 0.548
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.085
Sensitivity 0.484
Positive Predictive Value 0.626
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 7 0 6 1 7
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 0 9 2 27
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7476 37 3 24 10 33
3J3F_7 0.76 0.64 0.91 32 7225 3 0 3 0 18
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.36 12 12213 35 3 18 14 24
3J3V_B 0.53 0.42 0.67 24 6985 12 1 11 0 33
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 16 14162 21 2 16 3 36
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 24 1 20 3 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11
4FRG_B 0.37 0.31 0.45 10 3464 12 3 9 0 22

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 364
Total TN 240022
Total FP 145
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 830
Total Scores
MCC 0.471
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.406 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.305
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.77 0.59 1.00 16 2987 1 0 0 1 11
3IZ4_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 70876 0 0 0 0 132
3IZF_C 0.73 0.63 0.85 34 6863 7 1 5 1 20
3J20_1 0.25 0.22 0.29 5 2909 12 0 12 0 18
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.34 0.25 0.48 13 7848 16 1 13 2 40
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 7099 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_7 0.72 0.64 0.82 32 7221 8 0 7 1 18
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3J3V_B 0.19 0.12 0.30 7 6998 16 0 16 0 50
3NPB_A 0.30 0.24 0.39 11 6993 18 1 16 1 35
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 12 3 6 3 9
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2194 0 0 0 0 17
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.71 0.90 35 6982 4 0 4 0 14
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
3ZND_W -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2988 16 3 12 1 23
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 7 0 6 1 22
4AOB_A 0.39 0.26 0.58 11 4352 9 0 8 1 31
4ENB_A 0.39 0.16 1.00 3 1272 0 0 0 0 16
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.