CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot McQFold
MCC 0.478 > 0.421
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.069 > 0.497 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.423 > 0.360
Positive Predictive Value 0.542 > 0.493
Total TP 1531 > 1305
Total TN 2725661 < 2725837
Total FP 1413 < 1426
Total FP CONTRA 151 > 140
Total FP INCONS 1141 < 1202
Total FP COMP 121 > 84
Total FN 2090 < 2316
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and McQFold).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1531
Total TN 2725661
Total FP 1413
Total FP CONTRA 151
Total FP INCONS 1141
Total FP COMP 121
Total FN 2090
Total Scores
MCC 0.478
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.423
Positive Predictive Value 0.542
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 5121 11 2 4 5 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 621 3 0 3 0 13
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.77 0.94 30 6073 4 0 2 2 9
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1638 15 0 15 0 17
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60616 85 22 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.27 0.27 0.28 9 6184 26 2 21 3 24
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3J20_2 0.50 0.43 0.57 272 1116290 208 11 192 5 361
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 7 0 6 1 7
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.60 0.52 0.70 33 10249 15 0 14 1 30
3J2C_M - 0.37 0.30 0.45 63 106352 79 9 67 3 144
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 0 9 2 27
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7476 37 3 24 10 33
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.36 12 12213 35 3 18 14 24
3J3F_7 0.76 0.64 0.91 32 7225 3 0 3 0 18
3J3V_B 0.53 0.42 0.67 24 6985 12 1 11 0 33
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 0 6 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 32 4721 1 0 0 1 8
3ZEX_B - 0.29 0.26 0.33 146 1071940 307 34 260 13 412
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2620 11 2 6 3 12
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 16 14162 21 2 16 3 36
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.19 7 9009 29 4 25 0 31
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21886 61 2 57 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.77 0.66 0.91 49 16417 10 0 5 5 25
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 24 1 20 3 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11
4FNJ_A - 0.66 0.50 0.89 8 586 1 0 1 0 8
4FRG_B 0.37 0.31 0.45 10 3464 12 3 9 0 22
4FRN_A 0.44 0.36 0.54 13 5127 11 2 9 0 23
4JF2_A 0.80 0.71 0.92 22 2826 2 2 0 0 9
4JRC_A - 0.25 0.22 0.31 5 1524 11 0 11 0 18

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1305
Total TN 2725837
Total FP 1426
Total FP CONTRA 140
Total FP INCONS 1202
Total FP COMP 84
Total FN 2316
Total Scores
MCC 0.421
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.497 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.360
Positive Predictive Value 0.493
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.59 0.53 0.68 21 5120 13 3 7 3 19
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.51 0.46 0.58 18 6074 13 2 11 0 21
2M58_A - 0.56 0.47 0.67 8 1641 4 1 3 0 9
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2679 6 1 4 1 11
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 1 0 0 1 6
3AMU_B 0.75 0.59 0.94 16 2986 3 0 1 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60614 87 19 64 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.36 0.49 47 70780 53 6 43 4 85
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 10 0 10 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.26 0.24 0.30 8 6189 21 0 19 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3J20_2 0.46 0.39 0.54 249 1116304 216 8 204 4 384
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J2C_O - 0.53 0.43 0.66 27 10255 15 1 13 1 36
3J2C_M - 0.31 0.25 0.38 51 106357 86 12 71 3 156
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.59 20 7106 14 1 13 0 34
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7479 36 3 21 12 33
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.30 11 12209 38 4 22 12 25
3J3F_7 0.18 0.16 0.22 8 7223 29 1 28 0 42
3J3V_B 0.49 0.33 0.73 19 6995 7 0 7 0 38
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.70 0.93 43 9134 4 1 2 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.36 0.31 0.44 8 1998 10 1 9 0 18
3NPB_A 0.81 0.67 0.97 31 6989 4 1 0 3 15
3O58_3 0.26 0.26 0.26 9 12368 26 10 16 0 26
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 40 12834 9 0 6 3 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.60 0.86 25 3887 4 0 4 0 17
3U4M_B - 0.73 0.57 0.95 21 3138 1 0 1 0 16
3UZL_B 0.45 0.41 0.52 15 3541 14 0 14 0 22
3W1K_J 0.78 0.63 0.96 24 4161 1 1 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4725 14 0 13 1 25
3ZEX_B - 0.11 0.09 0.13 53 1071960 373 32 335 6 505
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2619 9 2 7 0 12
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.21 0.34 11 14164 24 2 19 3 41
3ZEX_H - 0.21 0.21 0.22 8 9009 29 6 22 1 30
3ZEX_D 0.69 0.53 0.90 26 6992 3 1 2 0 23
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21894 53 4 47 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.31 0.27 0.36 20 16416 38 1 34 3 54
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 33 5 23 5 28
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ATO_G - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 523 5 0 5 0 10
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 588 7 0 7 0 16
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11
4FRN_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 20 5130 1 1 0 0 16
4JF2_A 0.83 0.81 0.86 25 2821 4 3 1 0 6
4JRC_A - 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 1524 0 0 0 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.