CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.549 > 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.543 ± 0.088 > 0.517 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.487 > 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.624 < 0.691
Total TP 554 > 479
Total TN 232609 < 232804
Total FP 407 > 241
Total FP CONTRA 43 > 42
Total FP INCONS 291 > 172
Total FP COMP 73 > 27
Total FN 583 < 658
P-value 7.61266898416e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 554
Total TN 232609
Total FP 407
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 291
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 583
Total Scores
MCC 0.549
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.543 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.487
Positive Predictive Value 0.624
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.71 0.70 0.73 16 2904 7 0 6 1 7
3J2L_3 0.60 0.49 0.74 26 7840 11 0 9 2 27
3J3D_C 0.46 0.43 0.50 12 2751 12 1 11 0 16
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7476 37 3 24 10 33
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.36 12 12213 35 3 18 14 24
3J3F_7 0.76 0.64 0.91 32 7225 3 0 3 0 18
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.38 0.31 0.47 16 14162 21 2 16 3 36
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.67 0.89 33 6984 4 0 4 0 16
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 24 1 20 3 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4A1C_3 0.73 0.61 0.87 33 7102 6 1 4 1 21
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11
4FRG_B 0.37 0.31 0.45 10 3464 12 3 9 0 22

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 479
Total TN 232804
Total FP 241
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 172
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 658
Total Scores
MCC 0.538
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.691
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.61 0.41 0.92 11 2991 1 0 1 0 16
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.43 0.65 57 70788 35 8 23 4 75
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 3 1 2 0 21
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_1 0.66 0.48 0.92 11 2914 1 0 1 0 12
3J2L_3 0.58 0.40 0.84 21 7850 5 0 4 1 32
3J3D_C 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2755 2 0 2 0 10
3J3E_7 0.63 0.50 0.79 27 7106 7 1 6 0 27
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 3 0 3 0 16
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7015 6 1 5 0 46
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3O58_3 0.32 0.34 0.30 12 12363 28 12 16 0 23
3PDR_A 0.67 0.49 0.92 35 12842 5 0 3 2 37
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.68 0.60 0.78 25 3884 7 1 6 0 17
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.19 0.36 10 14168 18 2 16 0 42
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.34 0.22 0.56 5 2994 7 0 4 3 18
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4A1C_3 0.48 0.33 0.69 18 7114 8 0 8 0 36
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13
4FRG_B 0.17 0.09 0.33 3 3477 6 0 6 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.