CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.501 > 0.156
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.520 ± 0.110 > 0.071 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.413 > 0.036
Positive Predictive Value 0.615 < 0.689
Total TP 356 > 31
Total TN 128420 < 128954
Total FP 271 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 24 > 0
Total FP INCONS 199 > 14
Total FP COMP 48 < 61
Total FN 506 < 831
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 356
Total TN 128420
Total FP 271
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 506
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.520 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.615
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.48 0.35 0.66 19 7111 10 0 10 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 30 1 19 10 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.35 12 12212 35 3 19 13 24
3J3F_7 0.18 0.16 0.22 8 7224 28 1 27 0 42
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
3W1K_J 0.84 0.74 0.97 28 4157 1 1 0 0 10
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 1 17 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 128954
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 831
Total Scores
MCC 0.156
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.071 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.036
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.