CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RDfolder
MCC 0.556 > 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.488 ± 0.183 > 0.350 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.450 > 0.302
Positive Predictive Value 0.698 > 0.533
Total TP 134 > 90
Total TN 26359 < 26382
Total FP 60 < 81
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 6
Total FP INCONS 50 < 73
Total FP COMP 2 = 2
Total FN 164 < 208
P-value 2.26346675981e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 26359
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.488 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4JRC_A - 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 1524 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 26382
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 208
Total Scores
MCC 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.350 ± 0.184
Sensitivity 0.302
Positive Predictive Value 0.533
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ATO_G - 0.63 0.40 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 6
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.81 0.65 1.00 15 1525 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.