CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.399 > 0.333
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.278 > 0.326 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.347 > 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.464 < 0.500
Total TP 85 > 55
Total TN 54686 < 54759
Total FP 141 > 81
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 4
Total FP INCONS 84 > 51
Total FP COMP 43 > 26
Total FN 160 < 190
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 85
Total TN 54686
Total FP 141
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 160
Total Scores
MCC 0.399
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.278
Sensitivity 0.347
Positive Predictive Value 0.464
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 30 1 19 10 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.35 12 12212 35 3 19 13 24
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 55
Total TN 54759
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.333
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.326 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.224
Positive Predictive Value 0.500
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.