CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASLOpt RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.501 > 0.115
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.520 ± 0.110 > 0.090 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.413 > 0.046
Positive Predictive Value 0.615 > 0.294
Total TP 356 > 40
Total TN 128420 < 128863
Total FP 271 > 100
Total FP CONTRA 24 > 6
Total FP INCONS 199 > 90
Total FP COMP 48 > 4
Total FN 506 < 822
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASLOpt and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASLOpt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 356
Total TN 128420
Total FP 271
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 506
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.520 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.615
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J16_L 0.53 0.40 0.71 12 2758 5 0 5 0 18
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 1 4 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.56 0.43 0.72 23 7843 11 0 9 2 30
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.48 0.35 0.66 19 7111 10 0 10 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 30 1 19 10 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.35 12 12212 35 3 19 13 24
3J3F_7 0.18 0.16 0.22 8 7224 28 1 27 0 42
3UZL_B 0.48 0.32 0.71 12 3553 5 0 5 0 25
3W1K_J 0.84 0.74 0.97 28 4157 1 1 0 0 10
3W3S_B 0.82 0.70 0.97 28 4724 2 0 1 1 12
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.59 0.97 29 6991 1 0 1 0 20
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 1 17 2 18
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 40
Total TN 128863
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 822
Total Scores
MCC 0.115
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.090 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.046
Positive Predictive Value 0.294
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 30
3J20_1 0.09 0.04 0.20 1 2921 4 0 4 0 22
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7870 5 0 5 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2771 4 1 3 0 28
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7132 8 0 8 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.14 0.06 0.33 2 12240 5 1 3 1 34
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7256 4 0 4 0 50
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37
3W1K_J 0.51 0.29 0.92 11 4174 1 0 1 0 27
3W3S_B 0.41 0.30 0.57 12 4732 10 1 8 1 28
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7019 2 0 2 0 49
3ZEX_C 0.10 0.04 0.25 2 14188 6 1 5 0 50
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3000 4 0 3 1 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3484 2 0 2 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5148 3 0 3 0 36
4JF2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 31

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.