CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) IPknot
MCC 0.585 > 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.100 > 0.529 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.448 > 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.768 > 0.645
Total TP 354 > 342
Total TN 119864 > 119795
Total FP 143 < 223
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 16
Total FP INCONS 100 < 172
Total FP COMP 36 > 35
Total FN 436 < 448
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 354
Total TN 119864
Total FP 143
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 436
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.448
Positive Predictive Value 0.768
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 12 1 9 2 36
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.18 3 7486 21 2 12 7 30
3J3E_7 0.62 0.48 0.81 26 7108 6 0 6 0 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 17 1 13 3 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 5 0 5 0 24
3J3V_B 0.63 0.42 0.96 24 6996 1 0 1 0 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.49 0.96 24 6996 1 0 1 0 25
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.19 0.38 10 14170 20 1 15 4 42
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 15 2 10 3 14
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.55 0.41 0.76 13 3469 4 0 4 0 19

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 342
Total TN 119795
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 172
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 448
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.645
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J2L_3 0.66 0.55 0.81 29 7839 9 0 7 2 24
3J3D_C 0.52 0.43 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 25 2 17 6 33
3J3E_7 0.47 0.35 0.63 19 7110 11 0 11 0 35
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 37 4 20 13 24
3J3F_7 0.67 0.60 0.75 30 7220 10 1 9 0 20
3J3V_B 0.40 0.30 0.55 17 6990 14 0 14 0 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.63 0.82 31 6983 7 0 7 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.41 0.21 0.79 11 14182 6 1 2 3 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11
4FRG_B 0.69 0.56 0.86 18 3465 3 1 2 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.