CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance Plots

Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

Total counts & total scores
Individual counts

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

Total counts & total scores
Individual counts

Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...

Overview

Metric	RNASampler(20)		NanoFolder
MCC	0.572	>	0.269
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.573 ± 0.137	>	0.291 ± 0.118
Sensitivity	0.442	>	0.280
Positive Predictive Value	0.745	>	0.267
Total TP	245	>	155
Total TN	89059	>	88807
Total FP	113	<	463
Total FP CONTRA	6	<	52
Total FP INCONS	78	<	374
Total FP COMP	29	<	37
Total FN	309	<	399
P-value	2.04409141234e-08

Performance plots

Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	245
Total TN	89059
Total FP	113
Total FP CONTRA	6
Total FP INCONS	78
Total FP COMP	29
Total FN	309

Total Scores
MCC	0.572
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.573 ± 0.137
Sensitivity	0.442
Positive Predictive Value	0.745
Nr of predictions	14

2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.91	1.00	21	2905	0	0	0	0	2
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.32	0.63	17	7848	12	1	9	2	36
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.71	0.95	20	2754	1	0	1	0	8
3J3E_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.48	0.81	26	7108	6	0	6	0	28
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.12	0.09	0.18	3	7486	21	2	12	7	30
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.33	0.46	12	12220	17	1	13	3	24
3J3F_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.52	0.84	26	7229	5	0	5	0	24
3J3V_B	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.42	0.96	24	6996	1	0	1	0	33
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.49	0.96	24	6996	1	0	1	0	25
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.39	0.43	9	2982	15	2	10	3	14
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.74	0.56	1.00	30	7110	0	0	0	0	24
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.15	0.23	5	11759	30	0	17	13	28
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.40	0.85	17	4351	4	0	3	1	25
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1315	0	0	0	0	8

Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	155
Total TN	88807
Total FP	463
Total FP CONTRA	52
Total FP INCONS	374
Total FP COMP	37
Total FN	399

Total Scores
MCC	0.269
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.291 ± 0.118
Sensitivity	0.280
Positive Predictive Value	0.267
Nr of predictions	14

2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
3J20_1	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.41	0.48	0.37	11	2896	19	5	14	0	12
3J2L_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.11	0.11	0.12	6	7824	46	3	42	1	47
3J3D_C	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.71	0.69	20	2746	9	2	7	0	8
3J3E_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.33	0.37	18	7091	31	1	30	0	36
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	7466	47	6	31	10	33
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.27	0.33	0.22	12	12192	54	9	33	12	24
3J3F_7	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.17	0.18	0.17	9	7208	43	3	40	0	41
3J3V_B	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.23	0.27	13	6973	35	1	34	0	44
3ZEX_D	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.27	0.27	13	6972	36	1	35	0	36
3ZND_W	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.22	0.17	5	2973	29	6	19	4	18
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.46	0.51	25	7091	24	2	22	0	29
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	11728	61	12	41	8	33
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.33	0.29	0.39	12	4340	20	1	18	1	30
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.58	0.58	11	1307	9	0	8	1	8

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.