CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.498 > 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.177 > 0.504 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.371 < 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.675 > 0.601
Total TP 135 < 143
Total TN 65765 > 65727
Total FP 93 < 131
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 12
Total FP INCONS 61 < 83
Total FP COMP 28 < 36
Total FN 229 > 221
P-value 7.29209047668e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 135
Total TN 65765
Total FP 93
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 229
Total Scores
MCC 0.498
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.371
Positive Predictive Value 0.675
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.18 3 7486 21 2 12 7 30
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 17 1 13 3 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.19 0.38 10 14170 20 1 15 4 42
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 65727
Total FP 131
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 83
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 221
Total Scores
MCC 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.504 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.601
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.