CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Afold
MCC 0.493 > 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.220 < 0.540 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.365 < 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.671 > 0.540
Total TP 112 < 136
Total TN 58677 > 58592
Total FP 78 < 167
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 15
Total FP INCONS 49 < 101
Total FP COMP 23 < 51
Total FN 195 > 171
P-value 0.0806085266796

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 58677
Total FP 78
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 49
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 195
Total Scores
MCC 0.493
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.220
Sensitivity 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.671
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 58592
Total FP 167
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 101
Total FP COMP 51
Total FN 171
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.540 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.540
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3W3S_B 0.50 0.45 0.56 18 4721 15 1 13 1 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.