CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Fold
MCC 0.421 > 0.385
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.410 ± 0.166 > 0.389 ± 0.234
Sensitivity 0.289 < 0.354
Positive Predictive Value 0.617 > 0.426
Total TP 103 < 126
Total TN 73232 > 73103
Total FP 94 < 228
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 22
Total FP INCONS 58 < 148
Total FP COMP 30 < 58
Total FN 253 > 230
P-value 8.26710183075e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 103
Total TN 73232
Total FP 94
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 30
Total FN 253
Total Scores
MCC 0.421
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.410 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.289
Positive Predictive Value 0.617
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 73103
Total FP 228
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 148
Total FP COMP 58
Total FN 230
Total Scores
MCC 0.385
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.389 ± 0.234
Sensitivity 0.354
Positive Predictive Value 0.426
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7478 34 2 23 9 33
3J3F_8 0.28 0.28 0.29 10 12211 39 5 20 14 26
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.