CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & HotKnots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) HotKnots
MCC 0.482 > 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.152 < 0.504 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.342 < 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.684 > 0.479
Total TP 160 < 192
Total TN 91818 > 91651
Total FP 107 < 255
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 37
Total FP INCONS 66 < 172
Total FP COMP 33 < 46
Total FN 308 > 276
P-value 2.22210847902e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and HotKnots).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 91818
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 308
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top



Performance of HotKnots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 192
Total TN 91651
Total FP 255
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 172
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 276
Total Scores
MCC 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.504 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.11 3 7476 33 2 22 9 30
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.30 11 12209 40 3 23 14 25
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.33 10 12216 31 5 15 11 23
3O58_3 0.23 0.26 0.21 9 12360 34 10 24 0 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W3S_B 0.55 0.50 0.61 20 4720 14 1 12 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14150 46 6 40 0 52
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 6 25 11 28
4JF2_A 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 2822 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.