CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.417 > 0.257
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.405 ± 0.189 > 0.188 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.283 > 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 < 0.689
Total TP 91 > 31
Total TN 60849 < 60951
Total FP 82 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 4 > 0
Total FP INCONS 52 > 14
Total FP COMP 26 < 61
Total FN 230 < 290
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 60849
Total FP 82
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 230
Total Scores
MCC 0.417
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.405 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.283
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 60951
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 290
Total Scores
MCC 0.257
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.188 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.097
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.