CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.423 > 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.241 > 0.411 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.300 < 0.335
Positive Predictive Value 0.600 > 0.503
Total TP 69 < 77
Total TN 51738 > 51700
Total FP 71 < 111
Total FP CONTRA 4 < 7
Total FP INCONS 42 < 69
Total FP COMP 25 < 35
Total FN 161 > 153
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 51738
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.423
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.241
Sensitivity 0.300
Positive Predictive Value 0.600
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 77
Total TN 51700
Total FP 111
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 153
Total Scores
MCC 0.408
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.411 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.335
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.