CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.482 > 0.452
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.152 > 0.484 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.342 < 0.406
Positive Predictive Value 0.684 > 0.509
Total TP 160 < 190
Total TN 91818 > 91679
Total FP 107 < 255
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 20
Total FP INCONS 66 < 163
Total FP COMP 33 < 72
Total FN 308 > 278
P-value 1.67657656842e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 91818
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 66
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 308
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity 0.342
Positive Predictive Value 0.684
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 10 0 10 0 20
3A3A_A 0.70 0.49 1.00 18 3637 0 0 0 0 19
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 7485 22 2 13 7 30
3J3F_8 0.44 0.33 0.57 12 12225 15 1 8 6 24
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 13 2 8 3 23
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 12 2 6 4 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.60 0.38 0.94 16 3899 1 0 1 0 26
3W3S_B 0.55 0.30 1.00 12 4741 1 0 0 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.19 0.53 10 14177 13 1 8 4 42
4A1C_2 0.31 0.24 0.40 8 11761 20 0 12 8 25
4JF2_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 10 2840 0 0 0 0 21

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 190
Total TN 91679
Total FP 255
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 163
Total FP COMP 72
Total FN 278
Total Scores
MCC 0.452
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.406
Positive Predictive Value 0.509
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 7477 32 2 21 9 30
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.29 11 12208 41 4 23 14 25
3JYX_4 0.32 0.30 0.34 10 12217 31 3 16 12 23
3O58_3 0.35 0.34 0.35 12 12369 33 1 21 11 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W3S_B 0.56 0.50 0.63 20 4721 13 1 11 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 42 5 26 11 28
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.