CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.660 > 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.094 > 0.589 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.519 > 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.844 > 0.700
Total TP 383 > 362
Total TN 105675 > 105612
Total FP 86 < 183
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 18
Total FP INCONS 65 < 137
Total FP COMP 15 < 28
Total FN 355 < 376
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 383
Total TN 105675
Total FP 86
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 355
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.844
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.69 0.47 1.00 25 7850 2 0 0 2 28
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_8 0.23 0.15 0.36 5 7489 9 1 8 0 28
3J3E_7 0.69 0.56 0.86 30 7105 5 1 4 0 24
3J3F_8 0.48 0.39 0.58 14 12222 17 1 9 7 22
3J3F_7 0.74 0.58 0.94 29 7229 2 0 2 0 21
3J3V_B 0.65 0.49 0.88 28 6989 4 0 4 0 29
3RKF_A 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2193 1 0 1 0 17
3SD1_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 25 3886 5 1 4 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_3 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 7108 1 0 1 0 23
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 23 2 19 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 362
Total TN 105612
Total FP 183
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 376
Total Scores
MCC 0.584
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.491
Positive Predictive Value 0.700
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_0 0.35 0.37 0.34 11 2818 22 3 18 1 19
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.73 0.62 0.87 33 7837 7 0 5 2 20
3J3D_C 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2753 5 0 5 0 11
3J3E_8 0.05 0.03 0.08 1 7490 16 1 11 4 32
3J3E_7 0.64 0.54 0.76 29 7102 9 0 9 0 25
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 33 4 20 9 24
3J3F_7 0.65 0.58 0.74 29 7221 10 1 9 0 21
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 1 7 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 0 5 0 17
3ZND_W 0.47 0.39 0.56 9 2987 10 0 7 3 14
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.41 0.41 0.43 13 3456 17 3 14 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.