CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) RNAsubopt
MCC 0.656 > 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.059 > 0.541 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.511 > 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.846 > 0.604
Total TP 769 > 717
Total TN 283798 > 283520
Total FP 189 < 563
Total FP CONTRA 25 < 58
Total FP INCONS 115 < 412
Total FP COMP 49 < 93
Total FN 735 < 787
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 769
Total TN 283798
Total FP 189
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 115
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 735
Total Scores
MCC 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.846
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.60 0.36 1.00 4 402 0 0 0 0 7
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3G4S_9 0.69 0.49 0.97 28 7352 3 1 0 2 29
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.74 0.58 0.95 18 2327 1 1 0 0 13
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.35 0.82 46 70820 15 4 6 5 86
3IZF_C 0.71 0.59 0.86 32 6866 5 1 4 0 22
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 9
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.69 0.47 1.00 25 7850 2 0 0 2 28
3J3D_C 0.80 0.68 0.95 19 2755 1 0 1 0 9
3J3E_7 0.69 0.56 0.86 30 7105 5 1 4 0 24
3J3E_8 0.23 0.15 0.36 5 7489 9 1 8 0 28
3J3F_7 0.74 0.58 0.94 29 7229 2 0 2 0 21
3J3F_8 0.48 0.39 0.58 14 12222 17 1 9 7 22
3J3V_B 0.65 0.49 0.88 28 6989 4 0 4 0 29
3JYV_7 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 11
3JYX_4 0.39 0.30 0.50 10 12226 15 0 10 5 23
3JYX_3 0.60 0.52 0.70 14 6308 17 0 6 11 13
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3NPB_A 0.68 0.48 0.96 22 6998 3 1 0 2 24
3O58_2 0.79 0.76 0.83 29 7225 7 3 3 1 9
3O58_3 0.37 0.26 0.53 9 12386 8 2 6 0 26
3PDR_A 0.76 0.61 0.96 44 12834 3 0 2 1 28
3RKF_A 0.68 0.50 0.94 17 2193 1 0 1 0 17
3SD1_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 25 3886 5 1 4 0 17
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 1 10 3 38
3ZND_W 0.47 0.43 0.53 10 2984 11 0 9 2 13
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 23 2 19 2 28
4A1C_3 0.74 0.57 0.97 31 7108 1 0 1 0 23
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 717
Total TN 283520
Total FP 563
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 412
Total FP COMP 93
Total FN 787
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.477
Positive Predictive Value 0.604
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
3A2K_C 0.42 0.39 0.46 11 2902 13 2 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3G4S_9 0.28 0.23 0.35 13 7344 24 1 23 0 44
3GX2_A 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4343 14 1 12 1 25
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.56 62 70766 49 8 40 1 70
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 2 0 0 2 2
3J2L_3 0.61 0.53 0.72 28 7836 13 0 11 2 25
3J3D_C 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 2751 8 0 8 0 12
3J3E_7 0.59 0.50 0.69 27 7101 12 1 11 0 27
3J3E_8 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 7475 32 2 21 9 28
3J3F_7 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 7222 4 0 3 1 15
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.32 12 12209 39 4 21 14 24
3J3V_B 0.54 0.42 0.71 24 6987 10 1 9 0 33
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2829 21 0 21 0 32
3JYX_4 0.19 0.21 0.17 7 12204 38 11 24 3 26
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.75 0.65 0.86 30 6986 7 1 4 2 16
3O58_2 0.72 0.74 0.70 28 7220 13 4 8 1 10
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.