CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.488 > 0.253
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.428 ± 0.239 > 0.295 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.280 > 0.276
Positive Predictive Value 0.855 > 0.241
Total TP 71 > 70
Total TN 46287 > 46079
Total FP 16 < 254
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 34
Total FP INCONS 12 < 187
Total FP COMP 4 < 33
Total FN 183 < 184
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 71
Total TN 46287
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.428 ± 0.239
Sensitivity 0.280
Positive Predictive Value 0.855
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4JF2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 11 2839 0 0 0 0 20

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 70
Total TN 46079
Total FP 254
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 187
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 184
Total Scores
MCC 0.253
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.295 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.276
Positive Predictive Value 0.241
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.55 0.50 11 1518 11 0 11 0 9
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7466 47 6 31 10 33
3J3F_8 0.27 0.33 0.22 12 12192 54 9 33 12 24
3W3S_B 0.17 0.18 0.18 7 4713 34 1 32 1 33
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8
4JF2_A 0.51 0.55 0.49 17 2815 18 5 13 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.