CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.595 > 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.532 ± 0.150 < 0.535 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.413 > 0.398
Positive Predictive Value 0.865 > 0.678
Total TP 160 > 154
Total TN 33331 > 33289
Total FP 28 < 75
Total FP CONTRA 5 = 5
Total FP INCONS 20 < 68
Total FP COMP 3 > 2
Total FN 227 < 233
P-value 1.42300079339e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 33331
Total FP 28
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 227
Total Scores
MCC 0.595
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.532 ± 0.150
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.865
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.71 0.51 1.00 19 3636 0 0 0 0 18
3GX2_A 0.74 0.55 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 18
3IVN_B 0.61 0.48 0.79 15 2327 4 2 2 0 16
3LA5_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2466 3 1 2 0 18
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 154
Total TN 33289
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 68
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 233
Total Scores
MCC 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.170
Sensitivity 0.398
Positive Predictive Value 0.678
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3634 6 0 6 0 22
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3W3S_B 0.27 0.23 0.33 9 4726 18 1 17 0 31
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.