CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

FAQ

Metric	RNAalifold(seed)		RNASampler(seed)
MCC	0.503	>	0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.470 ± 0.128	<	0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity	0.295	<	0.342
Positive Predictive Value	0.863	>	0.684
Total TP	138	<	160
Total TN	91892	>	91818
Total FP	27	<	107
Total FP CONTRA	4	<	8
Total FP INCONS	18	<	66
Total FP COMP	5	<	33
Total FN	330	>	308
P-value	1.32883086441e-08

Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).
Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

Total Scores
MCC	0.503
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.470 ± 0.128
Sensitivity	0.295
Positive Predictive Value	0.863
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	0.52	0.27	1.00	3	403	0	0	0	0	8
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1528	12	0	12	0	20
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.51	1.00	19	3636	0	0	0	0	18
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.48	0.79	15	2327	4	2	2	0	16
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	7503	0	0	0	0	33
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.25	1.00	9	12237	0	0	0	0	27
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.21	1.00	7	12239	2	0	0	2	26
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.51	0.26	1.00	9	12394	0	0	0	0	26
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.63	0.47	0.84	16	2192	3	1	2	0	18
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.40	0.85	17	3896	3	1	2	0	25
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.45	1.00	18	4735	1	0	0	1	22
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.42	0.17	1.00	9	14187	0	0	0	0	43
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.15	1.00	5	11776	2	0	0	2	28
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.35	1.00	11	2839	0	0	0	0	20

Total Scores
MCC	0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.494 ± 0.152
Sensitivity	0.342
Positive Predictive Value	0.684
Nr of predictions	14

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2KDQ_B	mir-TAR links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.91	1.00	10	396	0	0	0	0	1
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1530	10	0	10	0	20
3A3A_A	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.49	1.00	18	3637	0	0	0	0	19
3IVN_B	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.78	0.61	1.00	19	2327	0	0	0	0	12
3J3E_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.12	0.09	0.17	3	7485	22	2	13	7	30
3J3F_8	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.33	0.57	12	12225	15	1	8	6	24
3JYX_4	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.39	0.30	0.50	10	12226	13	2	8	3	23
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.34	0.60	12	12383	12	2	6	4	23
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.60	0.38	0.94	16	3899	1	0	1	0	26
3W3S_B	tRNA-Sec links to Rfam database...	0.55	0.30	1.00	12	4741	1	0	0	1	28
3ZEX_C	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.19	0.53	10	14177	13	1	8	4	42
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.31	0.24	0.40	8	11761	20	0	12	8	25
4JF2_A	preQ1-II links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.32	1.00	10	2840	0	0	0	0	21

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.