CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.543 > 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.508 ± 0.151 < 0.517 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.313 < 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.947 > 0.619
Total TP 107 < 133
Total TN 62198 > 62096
Total FP 9 < 118
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 9
Total FP INCONS 4 < 73
Total FP COMP 3 < 36
Total FN 235 > 209
P-value 4.78774507289e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 107
Total TN 62198
Total FP 9
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 235
Total Scores
MCC 0.543
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.508 ± 0.151
Sensitivity 0.313
Positive Predictive Value 0.947
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.17 1.00 9 14187 0 0 0 0 43
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 62096
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.