CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.527 > 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.145 < 0.514 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.320 < 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.874 > 0.626
Total TP 139 < 181
Total TN 72393 > 72263
Total FP 23 < 144
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 16
Total FP INCONS 17 < 92
Total FP COMP 3 < 36
Total FN 296 > 254
P-value 7.45609004183e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 139
Total TN 72393
Total FP 23
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 296
Total Scores
MCC 0.527
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.320
Positive Predictive Value 0.874
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
3W1K_J 0.71 0.50 1.00 19 4167 0 0 0 0 19
3ZEX_C 0.42 0.17 1.00 9 14187 0 0 0 0 43
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRN_A 0.69 0.53 0.90 19 5130 2 1 1 0 17
4JF2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 11 2839 0 0 0 0 20

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 181
Total TN 72263
Total FP 144
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 254
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.514 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.626
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.