CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) Vsfold4
MCC 0.542 > 0.457
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.094 > 0.509 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.333 < 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.887 > 0.542
Total TP 321 < 374
Total TN 247172 > 246844
Total FP 54 < 382
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 36
Total FP INCONS 29 < 280
Total FP COMP 13 < 66
Total FN 643 > 590
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 321
Total TN 247172
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 643
Total Scores
MCC 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.887
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.71 0.51 1.00 19 3636 0 0 0 0 18
3GX2_A 0.74 0.55 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 18
3IVN_B 0.61 0.48 0.79 15 2327 4 2 2 0 16
3IYQ_A 0.38 0.21 0.69 20 60697 13 5 4 4 74
3IZ4_A 0.42 0.21 0.85 28 70843 5 1 4 0 104
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.50 0.25 1.00 9 12237 0 0 0 0 27
3JYX_4 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 12239 2 0 0 2 26
3LA5_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2466 3 1 2 0 18
3NPB_A 0.66 0.48 0.92 22 6997 3 1 1 1 24
3O58_3 0.51 0.26 1.00 9 12394 0 0 0 0 26
3PDR_A 0.68 0.46 1.00 33 12847 1 0 0 1 39
3RKF_A 0.63 0.47 0.84 16 2192 3 1 2 0 18
3SD1_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 3896 3 1 2 0 25
3W3S_B 0.67 0.45 1.00 18 4735 1 0 0 1 22
4A1C_2 0.39 0.15 1.00 5 11776 2 0 0 2 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 22 4349 1 0 0 1 20
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.73 0.53 1.00 17 3469 0 0 0 0 15
4JF2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 11 2839 0 0 0 0 20

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 374
Total TN 246844
Total FP 382
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 280
Total FP COMP 66
Total FN 590
Total Scores
MCC 0.457
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.509 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.542
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 0 9 1 24
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.29 0.29 27 60634 71 13 52 6 67
3IZ4_A 0.36 0.31 0.43 41 70780 59 7 48 4 91
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.09 2 7481 32 2 18 12 31
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 27 4 15 8 25
3JYX_4 0.10 0.09 0.12 3 12220 33 2 21 10 30
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.61 0.50 0.74 23 6990 9 0 8 1 23
3O58_3 0.09 0.09 0.10 3 12373 35 5 22 8 32
3PDR_A 0.57 0.44 0.74 32 12837 13 0 11 2 40
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.19 0.17 0.24 7 3887 22 1 21 0 35
3W3S_B 0.67 0.58 0.79 23 4724 7 0 6 1 17
4A1C_2 0.28 0.24 0.33 8 11757 28 0 16 12 25
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1317 0 0 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.56 0.47 0.68 15 3464 7 1 6 0 17
4JF2_A 0.66 0.52 0.84 16 2831 3 0 3 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.