CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAfold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAfold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.511 > 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.455 ± 0.162 > 0.424 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.447 > 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.592 > 0.540
Total TP 193 > 177
Total TN 55100 > 55098
Total FP 152 < 167
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 18
Total FP INCONS 118 < 133
Total FP COMP 19 > 16
Total FN 239 < 255
P-value 2.89169006118e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAfold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAfold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 193
Total TN 55100
Total FP 152
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 239
Total Scores
MCC 0.511
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.455 ± 0.162
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.592
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 177
Total TN 55098
Total FP 167
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 133
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 255
Total Scores
MCC 0.467
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.410
Positive Predictive Value 0.540
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.