CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAfold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAfold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.556 > 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.104 > 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.487 > 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.641 < 0.825
Total TP 412 > 207
Total TN 137961 < 138353
Total FP 310 > 51
Total FP CONTRA 29 > 6
Total FP INCONS 202 > 38
Total FP COMP 79 > 7
Total FN 434 < 639
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAfold and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAfold and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 412
Total TN 137961
Total FP 310
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 202
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 434
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.487
Positive Predictive Value 0.641
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.68 0.55 0.85 22 4345 5 0 4 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3J3E_8 0.16 0.15 0.19 5 7476 31 2 20 9 28
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.31 11 12210 39 4 21 14 25
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.32 10 12215 33 5 16 12 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.83 0.72 0.97 33 6987 4 0 1 3 13
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.55 0.50 0.61 20 4720 14 1 12 1 20
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.76 0.61 0.95 19 2830 1 0 1 0 12

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 207
Total TN 138353
Total FP 51
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 639
Total Scores
MCC 0.448
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.445 ± 0.064
Sensitivity 0.245
Positive Predictive Value 0.825
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3W1K_J 0.43 0.21 0.89 8 4177 1 0 1 0 30
3W3S_B 0.41 0.23 0.75 9 4741 3 0 3 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29
4FRN_A 0.58 0.39 0.88 14 5135 2 1 1 0 22
4JF2_A 0.51 0.29 0.90 9 2840 2 0 1 1 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.