CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.556 > 0.179
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.087 > 0.078 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.490 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.636 < 1.000
Total TP 499 > 33
Total TN 165451 < 166202
Total FP 372 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 35 > 0
Total FP INCONS 250 > 0
Total FP COMP 87 > 0
Total FN 520 < 986
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 499
Total TN 165451
Total FP 372
Total FP CONTRA 35
Total FP INCONS 250
Total FP COMP 87
Total FN 520
Total Scores
MCC 0.556
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.572 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.636
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3A3A_A 0.76 0.65 0.89 24 3628 3 0 3 0 13
3GX2_A 0.76 0.63 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 15
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZF_C 0.59 0.52 0.68 28 6862 13 1 12 0 26
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 29 2 19 8 28
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.30 11 12209 39 3 23 13 25
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.77 0.63 0.94 29 6990 4 1 1 2 17
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.60 0.61 0.59 23 7221 18 4 12 2 15
3PDR_A 0.67 0.56 0.80 40 12830 12 0 10 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.55 0.48 0.63 19 4723 12 1 10 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.23 0.21 0.25 11 14152 41 1 32 8 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 5 25 11 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 33
Total TN 166202
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 986
Total Scores
MCC 0.179
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.078 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 4 1536 0 0 0 0 16
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3655 0 0 0 0 37
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 40
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2346 0 0 0 0 31
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 27
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 34
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 46
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 38
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.