CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.526 > 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.533 ± 0.087 > 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.460 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.608 < 0.689
Total TP 444 > 31
Total TN 137399 < 138084
Total FP 334 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 26 > 0
Total FP INCONS 260 > 14
Total FP COMP 48 < 61
Total FN 521 < 934
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 444
Total TN 137399
Total FP 334
Total FP CONTRA 26
Total FP INCONS 260
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 521
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.533 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.460
Positive Predictive Value 0.608
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2L_3 0.59 0.51 0.69 27 7836 14 0 12 2 26
3J3D_C 0.60 0.54 0.68 15 2753 7 0 7 0 13
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 29 2 19 8 28
3J3E_7 0.48 0.41 0.58 22 7102 16 1 15 0 32
3J3F_7 0.68 0.58 0.81 29 7224 7 1 6 0 21
3J3F_8 0.30 0.31 0.30 11 12209 39 3 23 13 25
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.64 0.52 0.79 22 3888 6 1 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.39 0.32 0.48 12 3545 13 2 11 0 25
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.55 0.48 0.63 19 4723 12 1 10 1 21
3ZEX_C 0.23 0.21 0.25 11 14152 41 1 32 8 41
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11746 41 5 25 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 1 6 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.52 0.44 0.62 16 5125 10 2 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 138084
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 934
Total Scores
MCC 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.