CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.555 > 0.179
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.102 > 0.078 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.497 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.625 < 1.000
Total TP 506 > 33
Total TN 165426 < 166202
Total FP 382 > 0
Total FP CONTRA 48 > 0
Total FP INCONS 255 > 0
Total FP COMP 79 > 0
Total FN 513 < 986
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 506
Total TN 165426
Total FP 382
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 255
Total FP COMP 79
Total FN 513
Total Scores
MCC 0.555
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.554 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.497
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.44 0.38 0.54 15 4343 14 1 12 1 25
3IVN_B 0.76 0.58 1.00 18 2328 0 0 0 0 13
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J3E_8 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 7475 32 2 21 9 28
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.32 12 12209 39 4 21 14 24
3JYX_3 0.63 0.63 0.63 17 6301 21 1 9 11 10
3JYX_4 0.19 0.21 0.17 7 12204 38 11 24 3 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.75 0.65 0.86 30 6986 7 1 4 2 16
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3O58_2 0.72 0.74 0.70 28 7220 13 4 8 1 10
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.51 0.44 0.59 16 5124 11 3 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.61 0.52 0.73 16 2828 6 3 3 0 15

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 33
Total TN 166202
Total FP 0
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 986
Total Scores
MCC 0.179
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.078 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 4 1536 0 0 0 0 16
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3655 0 0 0 0 37
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 40
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2346 0 0 0 0 31
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 54
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 27
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 34
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 46
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 38
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.