CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Fold
MCC 0.519 > 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.509 ± 0.068 > 0.498 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.463 > 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.586 > 0.570
Total TP 1155 > 1107
Total TN 544480 < 544509
Total FP 917 < 936
Total FP CONTRA 99 > 92
Total FP INCONS 717 < 743
Total FP COMP 101 = 101
Total FN 1341 < 1389
P-value 4.83792096436e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1155
Total TN 544480
Total FP 917
Total FP CONTRA 99
Total FP INCONS 717
Total FP COMP 101
Total FN 1341
Total Scores
MCC 0.519
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.509 ± 0.068
Sensitivity 0.463
Positive Predictive Value 0.586
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.52 0.43 0.65 17 5125 12 3 6 3 23
2KX8_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 846 0 0 0 0 3
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.77 0.86 30 6070 9 0 5 4 9
2M58_A - 0.51 0.41 0.64 7 1642 4 1 3 0 10
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XQD_Y 0.75 0.67 0.86 18 2829 3 0 3 0 9
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 0 0 0 0 6
3AKZ_H 0.39 0.36 0.43 10 2678 13 2 11 0 18
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 0 0 0 0 6
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.33 0.36 0.30 34 60614 82 17 61 4 60
3IZ4_A 0.51 0.47 0.56 62 70766 49 8 40 1 70
3IZF_C 0.70 0.61 0.80 33 6862 8 1 7 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 25 0 21 4 25
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.31 0.42 5 1116 7 1 6 0 11
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J16_L 0.41 0.37 0.48 11 2752 12 1 11 0 19
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 2 0 0 2 2
3J2C_M - 0.44 0.37 0.52 76 106346 72 8 61 3 131
3J2C_O - 0.56 0.49 0.65 31 10248 17 1 16 0 32
3J2L_3 0.61 0.53 0.72 28 7836 13 0 11 2 25
3J3D_C 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 2751 8 0 8 0 12
3J3E_8 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 7475 32 2 21 9 28
3J3E_7 0.59 0.50 0.69 27 7101 12 1 11 0 27
3J3F_7 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 7222 4 0 3 1 15
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.32 12 12209 39 4 21 14 24
3J3V_B 0.54 0.42 0.71 24 6987 10 1 9 0 33
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.86 42 9131 8 0 7 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.57 0.50 0.65 13 1996 7 0 7 0 13
3NPB_A 0.75 0.65 0.86 30 6986 7 1 4 2 16
3O58_2 0.72 0.74 0.70 28 7220 13 4 8 1 10
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 34 2 21 11 23
3PDR_A 0.75 0.63 0.90 45 12830 7 1 4 2 27
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.48 0.38 0.61 14 3547 9 0 9 0 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.87 0.78 0.97 31 4721 2 0 1 1 9
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.18 7 9006 32 6 26 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14157 42 1 27 14 41
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21893 54 4 48 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.46 0.42 0.52 31 16411 32 3 26 3 43
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ATO_G - 0.30 0.30 0.33 3 519 6 2 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23
4FRN_A 0.51 0.44 0.59 16 5124 11 3 8 0 20
4JF2_A 0.61 0.52 0.73 16 2828 6 3 3 0 15
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1107
Total TN 544509
Total FP 936
Total FP CONTRA 92
Total FP INCONS 743
Total FP COMP 101
Total FN 1389
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.444
Positive Predictive Value 0.570
Nr of predictions 61

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.76 0.60 0.96 24 5126 5 0 1 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.39 0.26 0.63 5 622 3 1 2 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.79 0.91 31 6071 5 0 3 2 8
2M58_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1638 15 0 15 0 17
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2906 3 0 2 1 10
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.80 0.74 0.88 28 4154 4 0 4 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.84 0.75 0.95 21 2679 1 1 0 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.78 0.71 0.86 25 3211 4 0 4 0 10
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.31 0.27 29 60618 83 20 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.46 0.61 61 70776 44 5 34 5 71
3IZF_C 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 6864 7 1 6 0 22
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.26 8 6185 25 2 21 2 25
3J0L_a - 0.20 0.19 0.23 3 1115 10 2 8 0 13
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1213 12 0 12 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 0 5 0 14
3J20_0 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2827 12 0 11 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.15 0.23 32 106350 110 5 104 1 175
3J2C_O - 0.59 0.54 0.65 34 10244 18 1 17 0 29
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.47 0.43 0.52 12 2752 11 1 10 0 16
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7478 34 2 23 9 33
3J3E_7 0.46 0.37 0.57 20 7105 15 1 14 0 34
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.28 0.28 0.29 10 12211 39 5 20 14 26
3J3V_B 0.51 0.42 0.63 24 6983 14 1 13 0 33
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.35 0.31 0.42 8 1997 11 0 11 0 18
3NPB_A 0.70 0.61 0.80 28 6986 10 1 6 3 18
3O58_2 0.71 0.71 0.71 27 7222 12 3 8 1 11
3O58_3 0.29 0.31 0.28 11 12363 41 3 26 12 24
3PDR_A 0.77 0.64 0.94 46 12831 5 0 3 2 26
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.77 0.62 0.96 23 3546 1 0 1 0 14
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.85 0.75 0.97 30 4722 2 0 1 1 10
3ZEX_H - 0.18 0.18 0.19 7 9008 30 5 25 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.22 0.21 0.24 11 14151 45 4 30 11 41
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21890 57 2 53 2 77
3ZEX_G - 0.76 0.65 0.89 48 16417 12 0 6 6 26
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.67 0.87 33 6983 5 1 4 0 16
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2617 11 2 9 0 12
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.57 0.82 31 7102 7 1 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11744 43 5 27 11 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.32 0.30 0.38 3 520 5 1 4 0 7
4ENB_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1263 7 1 6 0 14
4ENC_A 0.31 0.26 0.38 5 1313 8 1 7 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.24 0.22 0.27 7 3460 19 3 16 0 25
4FRN_A 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 5123 15 2 13 0 23
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.