CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Multilign(20)
MCC 0.547 > 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.540 ± 0.115 > 0.527 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.488 > 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 < 0.642
Total TP 332 > 306
Total TN 98572 < 98631
Total FP 247 > 195
Total FP CONTRA 18 = 18
Total FP INCONS 186 > 153
Total FP COMP 43 > 24
Total FN 349 < 375
P-value 1.32662850847e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 332
Total TN 98572
Total FP 247
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 186
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 349
Total Scores
MCC 0.547
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.540 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.488
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 2 0 0 2 2
3J2L_3 0.61 0.53 0.72 28 7836 13 0 11 2 25
3J3D_C 0.61 0.57 0.67 16 2751 8 0 8 0 12
3J3E_7 0.59 0.50 0.69 27 7101 12 1 11 0 27
3J3E_8 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 7475 32 2 21 9 28
3J3F_7 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 7222 4 0 3 1 15
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.32 12 12209 39 4 21 14 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.50 0.75 21 3888 7 1 6 0 21
3ZEX_D 0.80 0.69 0.92 34 6984 3 0 3 0 15
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 23 1 20 2 18
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.82 32 7101 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.13 5 11742 43 5 29 9 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.43 0.64 18 4343 11 2 8 1 24
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.32 0.26 0.42 5 1314 7 0 7 0 14
4FRG_B 0.32 0.28 0.38 9 3462 15 0 15 0 23

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 306
Total TN 98631
Total FP 195
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 153
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 375
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 19

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3J20_0 0.61 0.53 0.70 16 2827 8 1 6 1 14
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.65 0.53 0.80 28 7840 9 0 7 2 25
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.58 0.48 0.70 26 7103 11 0 11 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7481 22 6 16 0 33
3J3F_7 0.43 0.30 0.63 15 7236 9 0 9 0 35
3J3F_8 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 12218 27 1 14 12 23
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.75 0.65 0.86 32 6984 5 1 4 0 17
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 14 2 10 2 14
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.12 0.09 0.17 3 3468 15 0 15 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.