CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.387 > 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.094 > 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.363 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.422 < 0.689
Total TP 350 > 31
Total TN 137299 < 138084
Total FP 524 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 55 > 0
Total FP INCONS 425 > 14
Total FP COMP 44 < 61
Total FN 615 < 934
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 350
Total TN 137299
Total FP 524
Total FP CONTRA 55
Total FP INCONS 425
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 615
Total Scores
MCC 0.387
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.414 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.363
Positive Predictive Value 0.422
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 138084
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 934
Total Scores
MCC 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.