CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAwolf & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAwolf RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.415 > 0.395
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.416 ± 0.091 > 0.124 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.385 > 0.246
Positive Predictive Value 0.449 < 0.636
Total TP 616 > 393
Total TN 1253523 < 1254276
Total FP 807 > 232
Total FP CONTRA 72 > 15
Total FP INCONS 683 > 210
Total FP COMP 52 > 7
Total FN 982 < 1205
P-value 5.59469103578e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAwolf and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAwolf - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 616
Total TN 1253523
Total FP 807
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 683
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 982
Total Scores
MCC 0.415
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.416 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.385
Positive Predictive Value 0.449
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 393
Total TN 1254276
Total FP 232
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 210
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 1205
Total Scores
MCC 0.395
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.124 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.246
Positive Predictive Value 0.636
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3J20_1 0.09 0.04 0.20 1 2921 4 0 4 0 22
3J20_2 0.62 0.53 0.73 335 1116304 129 9 117 3 298
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7870 5 0 5 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2771 4 1 3 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7132 8 0 8 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7256 4 0 4 0 50
3J3F_8 0.14 0.06 0.33 2 12240 5 1 3 1 34
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37
3W1K_J 0.51 0.29 0.92 11 4174 1 0 1 0 27
3W3S_B 0.41 0.30 0.57 12 4732 10 1 8 1 28
3ZEX_C 0.10 0.04 0.25 2 14188 6 1 5 0 50
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7019 2 0 2 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3000 4 0 3 1 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3484 2 0 2 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5148 3 0 3 0 36
4JF2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 31

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.