CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Afold
MCC 0.549 > 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.553 ± 0.140 > 0.537 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.462 < 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.655 > 0.567
Total TP 317 < 322
Total TN 166207 > 166123
Total FP 199 < 315
Total FP CONTRA 46 > 40
Total FP INCONS 121 < 206
Total FP COMP 32 < 69
Total FN 369 > 364
P-value 3.18846395401e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 317
Total TN 166207
Total FP 199
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 32
Total FN 369
Total Scores
MCC 0.549
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.553 ± 0.140
Sensitivity 0.462
Positive Predictive Value 0.655
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
3A2K_C 0.78 0.68 0.90 19 2905 2 0 2 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 0 1 0 11
3IZ4_A 0.53 0.43 0.65 57 70788 35 8 23 4 75
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 3 1 2 0 21
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3JYV_7 0.77 0.63 0.95 20 2829 1 0 1 0 12
3JYX_3 0.61 0.56 0.68 15 6306 13 0 7 6 12
3JYX_4 0.28 0.27 0.30 9 12216 33 5 16 12 24
3LA5_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 14
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7015 6 1 5 0 46
3O58_3 0.32 0.34 0.30 12 12363 28 12 16 0 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
4A1C_2 0.19 0.18 0.20 6 11751 30 6 18 6 27
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 322
Total TN 166123
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 206
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 364
Total Scores
MCC 0.514
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.567
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 7477 31 2 19 10 28
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3ZEX_D 0.72 0.61 0.86 30 6986 5 0 5 0 19
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.