CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & CMfinder(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) CMfinder(20)
MCC 0.566 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.202 < 0.527 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.443 > 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.729 < 0.751
Total TP 172 > 151
Total TN 60923 < 60958
Total FP 78 > 56
Total FP CONTRA 8 > 4
Total FP INCONS 56 > 46
Total FP COMP 14 > 6
Total FN 216 < 237
P-value 1.30295446166e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and CMfinder(20)).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 172
Total TN 60923
Total FP 78
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 216
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.521 ± 0.202
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.729
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J2L_3 0.58 0.40 0.84 21 7850 5 0 4 1 32
3J3D_C 0.76 0.64 0.90 18 2755 2 0 2 0 10
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7484 19 4 15 0 33
3J3E_7 0.63 0.50 0.79 27 7106 7 1 6 0 27
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 23 2 12 9 24
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 3 0 3 0 16
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.65 0.89 32 6985 4 1 3 0 17
3ZND_W 0.34 0.22 0.56 5 2994 7 0 4 3 18
4FRG_B 0.17 0.09 0.33 3 3477 6 0 6 0 29

^top



Performance of CMfinder(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 151
Total TN 60958
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 46
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 237
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.138
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_0 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2833 1 0 0 1 13
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 11 1 9 1 36
3J3D_C 0.76 0.61 0.94 17 2757 1 0 1 0 11
3J3E_8 0.10 0.06 0.17 2 7491 10 1 9 0 31
3J3E_7 0.62 0.46 0.83 25 7110 5 1 4 0 29
3J3F_8 0.45 0.33 0.60 12 12226 8 1 7 0 24
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 6 0 5 1 24
3ZEX_D 0.58 0.39 0.86 19 6999 3 0 3 0 30
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4FRG_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 7 3479 0 0 0 0 25

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.