CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.554 > 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.082 > 0.095 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.469 > 0.172
Positive Predictive Value 0.657 < 0.893
Total TP 774 > 284
Total TN 1281822 < 1282682
Total FP 485 > 36
Total FP CONTRA 39 > 3
Total FP INCONS 365 > 31
Total FP COMP 81 > 2
Total FN 878 < 1368
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 774
Total TN 1281822
Total FP 485
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 365
Total FP COMP 81
Total FN 878
Total Scores
MCC 0.554
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.469
Positive Predictive Value 0.657
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 22 4348 2 0 1 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IZF_C 0.71 0.61 0.83 33 6863 7 0 7 0 21
3J20_2 0.47 0.41 0.55 261 1116287 220 14 203 3 372
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 32 2 22 8 31
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 12 12214 34 3 17 14 24
3JYX_3 0.62 0.63 0.61 17 6300 19 1 10 8 10
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.91 30 6988 6 1 2 3 16
3O58_2 0.74 0.74 0.74 28 7222 11 3 7 1 10
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.85 40 12833 9 0 7 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.57 0.53 0.64 21 4720 13 1 11 1 19
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.21 0.48 11 14173 26 1 11 14 41
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.62 0.47 0.83 15 3468 3 1 2 0 17
4FRN_A 0.63 0.44 0.89 16 5133 2 2 0 0 20
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 284
Total TN 1282682
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 1368
Total Scores
MCC 0.392
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.095 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.172
Positive Predictive Value 0.893
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 4 1536 0 0 0 0 16
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3655 0 0 0 0 37
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 40
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2346 0 0 0 0 31
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6903 0 0 0 0 54
3J20_2 0.59 0.40 0.88 251 1116480 36 3 31 2 382
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 0 0 0 0 33
3J3F_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 36
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6328 0 0 0 0 27
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12246 0 0 0 0 33
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2485 0 0 0 0 34
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 46
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 38
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12403 0 0 0 0 35
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12880 0 0 0 0 72
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 14196 0 0 0 0 52
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11781 0 0 0 0 33
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.