CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.544 > 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.083 > 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.450 > 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.664 < 0.689
Total TP 434 > 31
Total TN 137475 < 138084
Total FP 274 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 22 > 0
Total FP INCONS 198 > 14
Total FP COMP 54 < 61
Total FN 531 < 934
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 434
Total TN 137475
Total FP 274
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 198
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 531
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.083
Sensitivity 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 6 0 5 1 7
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.36 0.25 0.54 7 2762 6 0 6 0 21
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 32 2 22 8 31
3J3E_7 0.60 0.50 0.73 27 7103 10 1 9 0 27
3J3F_7 0.69 0.60 0.79 30 7222 8 1 7 0 20
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 12 12214 34 3 17 14 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3UZL_B 0.51 0.32 0.80 12 3555 3 2 1 0 25
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.57 0.53 0.64 21 4720 13 1 11 1 19
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.21 0.48 11 14173 26 1 11 14 41
3ZEX_D 0.74 0.63 0.86 31 6985 5 0 5 0 18
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.62 0.47 0.83 15 3468 3 1 2 0 17
4FRN_A 0.63 0.44 0.89 16 5133 2 2 0 0 20
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 31
Total TN 138084
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 934
Total Scores
MCC 0.148
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.063 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.032
Positive Predictive Value 0.689
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3J20_1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2926 0 0 0 0 23
3J20_0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2850 0 0 0 0 30
3J2L_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7875 0 0 0 0 53
3J3D_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 28
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7503 6 0 0 6 33
3J3E_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
3J3F_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7260 0 0 0 0 50
3J3F_8 0.23 0.11 0.50 4 12238 22 0 4 18 32
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
3W1K_J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4186 0 0 0 0 38
3W3S_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4753 0 0 0 0 40
3ZEX_C 0.20 0.08 0.50 4 14188 22 0 4 18 48
3ZEX_D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7021 0 0 0 0 49
3ZND_W 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 23
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19
4FRG_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3486 0 0 0 0 32
4FRN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5151 0 0 0 0 36
4JF2_A 0.72 0.52 1.00 16 2834 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.