CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold RNAwolf
MCC 0.468 > 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.074 > 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.393 > 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.559 > 0.344
Total TP 1139 > 849
Total TN 2521749 > 2521319
Total FP 983 < 1693
Total FP CONTRA 83 < 186
Total FP INCONS 815 < 1432
Total FP COMP 85 > 75
Total FN 1757 < 2047
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1139
Total TN 2521749
Total FP 983
Total FP CONTRA 83
Total FP INCONS 815
Total FP COMP 85
Total FN 1757
Total Scores
MCC 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.476 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.393
Positive Predictive Value 0.559
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
2LKR_A - 0.89 0.79 1.00 31 6074 1 0 0 1 8
2M58_A - 0.29 0.18 0.50 3 1647 3 1 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 460 5 1 4 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.51 0.50 0.53 8 1113 7 3 4 0 8
3J0L_2 - 0.36 0.33 0.39 11 6188 19 2 15 2 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1222 3 0 3 0 17
3J16_L 0.29 0.23 0.37 7 2756 12 0 12 0 23
3J20_1 0.73 0.70 0.76 16 2905 6 0 5 1 7
3J20_2 0.47 0.41 0.55 261 1116287 220 14 203 3 372
3J20_0 0.43 0.40 0.48 12 2825 14 0 13 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.64 0.48 0.86 30 10261 6 0 5 1 33
3J2C_M - 0.63 0.49 0.80 102 106363 31 3 23 5 105
3J2L_3 0.62 0.53 0.74 28 7837 12 0 10 2 25
3J3D_C 0.36 0.25 0.54 7 2762 6 0 6 0 21
3J3E_7 0.60 0.50 0.73 27 7103 10 1 9 0 27
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 32 2 22 8 31
3J3F_8 0.35 0.33 0.38 12 12214 34 3 17 14 24
3J3F_7 0.69 0.60 0.79 30 7222 8 1 7 0 20
3J3V_B 0.51 0.37 0.72 21 6992 8 0 8 0 36
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.51 0.32 0.80 12 3555 3 2 1 0 25
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3W3S_B 0.57 0.53 0.64 21 4720 13 1 11 1 19
3ZEX_B - 0.31 0.27 0.36 152 1071959 280 27 242 11 406
3ZEX_D 0.74 0.63 0.86 31 6985 5 0 5 0 18
3ZEX_G - 0.78 0.68 0.91 50 16416 9 0 5 4 24
3ZEX_H - 0.19 0.18 0.19 7 9009 29 5 24 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.32 0.21 0.48 11 14173 26 1 11 14 41
3ZEX_F - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2623 7 2 3 2 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21891 56 3 51 2 77
3ZND_W 0.20 0.22 0.19 5 2977 22 1 20 1 18
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ATO_G - 0.31 0.10 1.00 1 527 0 0 0 0 9
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FNJ_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 10 585 0 0 0 0 6
4FRG_B 0.62 0.47 0.83 15 3468 3 1 2 0 17
4FRN_A 0.63 0.44 0.89 16 5133 2 2 0 0 20
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12
4JRC_A - 0.29 0.26 0.35 6 1523 11 0 11 0 17

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 849
Total TN 2521319
Total FP 1693
Total FP CONTRA 186
Total FP INCONS 1432
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 2047
Total Scores
MCC 0.317
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.342 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.293
Positive Predictive Value 0.344
Nr of predictions 46

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2M58_A - 0.51 0.47 0.57 8 1639 6 3 3 0 9
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3J20_1 0.46 0.52 0.41 12 2897 17 6 11 0 11
3J20_2 0.45 0.42 0.49 266 1116224 283 17 258 8 367
3J20_0 0.40 0.40 0.41 12 2821 18 0 17 1 18
3J2C_O - 0.40 0.37 0.44 23 10244 30 0 29 1 40
3J2C_M - 0.19 0.17 0.21 35 106323 133 11 122 0 172
3J2L_3 0.55 0.49 0.62 26 7833 18 0 16 2 27
3J3D_C 0.79 0.75 0.84 21 2750 5 2 2 1 7
3J3E_7 0.41 0.35 0.49 19 7101 20 1 19 0 35
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7470 42 4 29 9 33
3J3F_8 0.23 0.25 0.21 9 12204 45 5 28 12 27
3J3F_7 0.21 0.20 0.23 10 7216 34 2 32 0 40
3J3V_B 0.43 0.37 0.51 21 6980 20 2 18 0 36
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
3W1K_J 0.71 0.66 0.78 25 4154 7 0 7 0 13
3W3S_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 25 4719 10 0 9 1 15
3ZEX_B - 0.14 0.13 0.15 70 1071902 417 55 353 9 488
3ZEX_D 0.20 0.18 0.22 9 6980 32 3 29 0 40
3ZEX_G - 0.20 0.18 0.23 13 16415 43 6 37 0 61
3ZEX_H - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 9006 40 8 31 1 38
3ZEX_C 0.05 0.06 0.06 3 14144 49 12 37 0 49
3ZEX_F - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2613 20 6 9 5 12
3ZEX_E - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21876 69 10 59 0 77
3ZND_W 0.50 0.48 0.52 11 2982 13 0 10 3 12
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ATO_G - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 520 8 1 7 0 10
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13
4FNJ_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 8 0 8 0 16
4FRG_B 0.56 0.50 0.64 16 3461 10 1 8 1 16
4FRN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 5119 32 0 32 0 36
4JF2_A 0.67 0.58 0.78 18 2827 5 3 2 0 13
4JRC_A - 0.58 0.52 0.67 12 1522 6 0 6 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.