CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) ContextFold
MCC 0.606 > 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.116 > 0.593 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.502 > 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.737 < 0.749
Total TP 316 > 310
Total TN 103745 < 103760
Total FP 156 > 148
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 16
Total FP INCONS 103 > 88
Total FP COMP 43 < 44
Total FN 314 < 320
P-value 0.0184072909178

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and ContextFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and ContextFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 316
Total TN 103745
Total FP 156
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 103
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 314
Total Scores
MCC 0.606
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.606 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.502
Positive Predictive Value 0.737
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J2L_3 0.74 0.58 0.94 31 7842 5 0 2 3 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.65 0.54 0.78 29 7103 8 1 7 0 25
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
3ZND_W 0.43 0.39 0.47 9 2984 12 1 9 2 14
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 310
Total TN 103760
Total FP 148
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 88
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 320
Total Scores
MCC 0.605
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.492
Positive Predictive Value 0.749
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J20_0 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2829 1 0 0 1 9
3J2L_3 0.79 0.62 1.00 33 7842 2 0 0 2 20
3J3D_C 0.73 0.61 0.89 17 2756 2 0 2 0 11
3J3E_7 0.72 0.56 0.94 30 7108 2 0 2 0 24
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 29 9 11 9 33
3J3F_8 0.33 0.31 0.37 11 12216 29 3 16 10 25
3J3F_7 0.81 0.68 0.97 34 7225 1 0 1 0 16
3ZEX_C 0.33 0.25 0.45 13 14167 22 1 15 6 39
3ZEX_D 0.81 0.67 0.97 33 6987 1 0 1 0 16
3ZND_W 0.21 0.22 0.22 5 2980 20 0 18 2 18
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.71 0.56 0.90 18 3466 2 1 1 0 14

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.