CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) MCFold
MCC 0.606 > 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.103 > 0.393 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.500 > 0.406
Positive Predictive Value 0.739 > 0.394
Total TP 334 > 271
Total TN 105555 > 105320
Total FP 162 < 477
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 48
Total FP INCONS 108 < 368
Total FP COMP 44 < 61
Total FN 334 < 397
P-value 2.34821445183e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 334
Total TN 105555
Total FP 162
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 108
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 334
Total Scores
MCC 0.606
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.500
Positive Predictive Value 0.739
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J2L_3 0.74 0.58 0.94 31 7842 5 0 2 3 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.65 0.54 0.78 29 7103 8 1 7 0 25
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
3ZND_W 0.43 0.39 0.47 9 2984 12 1 9 2 14
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 271
Total TN 105320
Total FP 477
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 368
Total FP COMP 61
Total FN 397
Total Scores
MCC 0.396
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.393 ± 0.106
Sensitivity 0.406
Positive Predictive Value 0.394
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3J20_0 0.59 0.57 0.63 17 2823 12 1 9 2 13
3J2L_3 0.58 0.57 0.60 30 7825 23 2 18 3 23
3J3D_C 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 2747 18 2 14 2 16
3J3E_7 0.40 0.39 0.42 21 7090 29 3 26 0 33
3J3E_8 0.12 0.12 0.12 4 7470 46 3 26 17 29
3J3F_7 0.74 0.74 0.74 37 7210 17 2 11 4 13
3J3F_8 0.13 0.17 0.11 6 12191 61 9 40 12 30
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3ZEX_C 0.24 0.21 0.28 11 14156 29 3 26 0 41
3ZEX_D 0.17 0.18 0.18 9 6970 42 4 38 0 40
3ZND_W 0.19 0.22 0.18 5 2975 26 1 22 3 18
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13
4FRG_B 0.32 0.34 0.31 11 3450 25 0 25 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.