CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) Murlet(20)
MCC 0.616 > 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.099 > 0.561 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.508 > 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.752 < 0.772
Total TP 372 > 322
Total TN 112809 < 112887
Total FP 168 > 117
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 6
Total FP INCONS 112 > 89
Total FP COMP 45 > 22
Total FN 361 < 411
P-value 4.94031556815e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 372
Total TN 112809
Total FP 168
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 361
Total Scores
MCC 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.508
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.74 0.58 0.94 31 7842 5 0 2 3 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.65 0.54 0.78 29 7103 8 1 7 0 25
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
3ZND_W 0.43 0.39 0.47 9 2984 12 1 9 2 14
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 322
Total TN 112887
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 411
Total Scores
MCC 0.580
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.772
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2983 3 0 2 1 9
3J20_0 0.58 0.47 0.74 14 2831 5 0 5 0 16
3J20_1 0.68 0.57 0.81 13 2910 3 0 3 0 10
3J2L_3 0.69 0.49 0.96 26 7848 3 0 1 2 27
3J3D_C 0.78 0.64 0.95 18 2756 1 0 1 0 10
3J3E_7 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
3J3E_8 0.24 0.15 0.38 5 7490 13 1 7 5 28
3J3F_7 0.69 0.50 0.96 25 7234 1 0 1 0 25
3J3F_8 0.48 0.36 0.65 13 12226 10 0 7 3 23
3RKF_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 16 2195 0 0 0 0 18
3SD1_A 0.68 0.57 0.83 24 3887 5 1 4 0 18
3ZEX_D 0.77 0.65 0.91 32 6986 3 0 3 0 17
3ZEX_C 0.34 0.23 0.50 12 14172 15 1 11 3 40
3ZND_W 0.45 0.39 0.53 9 2986 11 0 8 3 14
4A1C_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 22 7114 4 0 4 0 32
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.20 5 11756 24 2 18 4 28
4AOB_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 23 4347 2 0 1 1 19
4ENB_A 0.46 0.21 1.00 4 1271 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14
4FRG_B 0.17 0.13 0.25 4 3470 12 1 11 0 28

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.