CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.488 > 0.429
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.163 > 0.435 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.389 > 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 < 0.843
Total TP 133 > 75
Total TN 62096 < 62222
Total FP 118 > 17
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 1
Total FP INCONS 73 > 13
Total FP COMP 36 > 3
Total FN 209 < 267
P-value 1.12659692944e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 62096
Total FP 118
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 73
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 209
Total Scores
MCC 0.488
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.389
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 75
Total TN 62222
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 267
Total Scores
MCC 0.429
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.435 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.219
Positive Predictive Value 0.843
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.25 0.06 1.00 2 7501 2 0 0 2 31
3J3F_8 0.44 0.19 1.00 7 12239 0 0 0 0 29
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
3ZEX_C 0.37 0.13 1.00 7 14189 0 0 0 0 45
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13
4FRG_B 0.15 0.09 0.25 3 3474 9 0 9 0 29

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.