CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) RDfolder
MCC 0.671 > 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.073 > 0.486 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.531 > 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.853 > 0.667
Total TP 128 > 88
Total TN 21577 < 21595
Total FP 26 < 48
Total FP CONTRA 3 = 3
Total FP INCONS 19 < 41
Total FP COMP 4 = 4
Total FN 113 < 153
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 21577
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.853
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 88
Total TN 21595
Total FP 48
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 153
Total Scores
MCC 0.489
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.365
Positive Predictive Value 0.667
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J20_0 0.73 0.57 0.94 17 2832 2 0 1 1 13
3J3D_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 17 2755 3 0 3 0 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.