CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & RNASampler(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) RNASampler(20)
MCC 0.616 > 0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.099 > 0.593 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.508 > 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.752 < 0.757
Total TP 372 > 330
Total TN 112809 < 112868
Total FP 168 > 142
Total FP CONTRA 11 > 7
Total FP INCONS 112 > 99
Total FP COMP 45 > 36
Total FN 361 < 403
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and RNASampler(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 372
Total TN 112809
Total FP 168
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 361
Total Scores
MCC 0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.508
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J20_0 0.66 0.57 0.77 17 2828 6 0 5 1 13
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.74 0.58 0.94 31 7842 5 0 2 3 22
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.65 0.54 0.78 29 7103 8 1 7 0 25
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_7 0.79 0.68 0.92 34 7223 4 0 3 1 16
3J3F_8 0.38 0.36 0.39 13 12213 34 2 18 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.76 0.63 0.91 31 6987 3 0 3 0 18
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
3ZND_W 0.43 0.39 0.47 9 2984 12 1 9 2 14
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRG_B 0.81 0.66 1.00 21 3465 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 330
Total TN 112868
Total FP 142
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 99
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 403
Total Scores
MCC 0.582
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 20

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J20_0 0.80 0.67 0.95 20 2829 2 0 1 1 10
3J20_1 0.96 0.91 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 2
3J2L_3 0.45 0.32 0.63 17 7848 12 1 9 2 36
3J3D_C 0.82 0.71 0.95 20 2754 1 0 1 0 8
3J3E_7 0.62 0.48 0.81 26 7108 6 0 6 0 28
3J3E_8 0.12 0.09 0.18 3 7486 21 2 12 7 30
3J3F_7 0.66 0.52 0.84 26 7229 5 0 5 0 24
3J3F_8 0.39 0.33 0.46 12 12220 17 1 13 3 24
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.67 0.48 0.95 20 3895 1 0 1 0 22
3ZEX_D 0.68 0.49 0.96 24 6996 1 0 1 0 25
3ZEX_C 0.27 0.19 0.38 10 14170 20 1 15 4 42
3ZND_W 0.41 0.39 0.43 9 2982 15 2 10 3 14
4A1C_3 0.74 0.56 1.00 30 7110 0 0 0 0 24
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.23 5 11759 30 0 17 13 28
4AOB_A 0.58 0.40 0.85 17 4351 4 0 3 1 25
4ENB_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1268 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8
4FRG_B 0.55 0.41 0.76 13 3469 4 0 4 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.