CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Contrafold
MCC 0.529 > 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.155 < 0.531 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.434 < 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.650 > 0.611
Total TP 212 < 214
Total TN 79366 > 79342
Total FP 150 < 175
Total FP CONTRA 16 < 24
Total FP INCONS 98 < 112
Total FP COMP 36 < 39
Total FN 277 > 275
P-value 2.54914456376e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 212
Total TN 79366
Total FP 150
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 98
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 277
Total Scores
MCC 0.529
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.650
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 214
Total TN 79342
Total FP 175
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 112
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 275
Total Scores
MCC 0.515
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.531 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.10 2 7483 32 1 17 14 31
3J3F_8 0.31 0.33 0.29 12 12205 41 4 25 12 24
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.28 0.21 0.38 11 14167 22 3 15 4 41
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8
4FRN_A 0.65 0.56 0.77 20 5125 6 1 5 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.