CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Multilign(20)
MCC 0.498 > 0.460
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.175 > 0.452 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.413 > 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.606 > 0.553
Total TP 129 > 121
Total TN 51556 > 51550
Total FP 117 > 115
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 14
Total FP INCONS 74 < 84
Total FP COMP 33 > 17
Total FN 183 < 191
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 129
Total TN 51556
Total FP 117
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 74
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 183
Total Scores
MCC 0.498
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.517 ± 0.175
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.606
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 51550
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 191
Total Scores
MCC 0.460
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.452 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.388
Positive Predictive Value 0.553
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7481 22 6 16 0 33
3J3F_8 0.41 0.36 0.46 13 12218 27 1 14 12 23
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.