CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Pknots
MCC 0.529 > 0.455
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.155 > 0.518 ± 0.181
Sensitivity 0.434 > 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.650 > 0.508
Total TP 212 > 202
Total TN 79366 > 79294
Total FP 150 < 235
Total FP CONTRA 16 < 21
Total FP INCONS 98 < 175
Total FP COMP 36 < 39
Total FN 277 < 287
P-value 2.66715895098e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 212
Total TN 79366
Total FP 150
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 98
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 277
Total Scores
MCC 0.529
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.527 ± 0.155
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.650
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 202
Total TN 79294
Total FP 235
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 175
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 287
Total Scores
MCC 0.455
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.518 ± 0.181
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.508
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 1522 3 1 2 0 5
3J3E_8 0.07 0.06 0.08 2 7479 33 2 20 11 31
3J3F_8 0.36 0.36 0.37 13 12211 34 2 20 12 23
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.65 0.52 0.81 22 3889 5 0 5 0 20
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.07 0.08 0.07 4 14141 54 4 47 3 48
4A1C_3 0.25 0.22 0.29 12 7099 29 1 28 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.25 8 11749 36 3 21 12 25
4AOB_A 0.17 0.14 0.21 6 4343 23 1 21 1 36
4ENB_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 15 1258 2 1 1 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRN_A 0.51 0.42 0.63 15 5127 9 1 8 0 21
4JF2_A 0.81 0.77 0.86 24 2822 4 3 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.