CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.504 > 0.430
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.179 > 0.456 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.416 > 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.616 > 0.525
Total TP 172 > 147
Total TN 73286 > 73285
Total FP 143 < 175
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 20
Total FP INCONS 92 < 113
Total FP COMP 36 < 42
Total FN 241 < 266
P-value 1.38194587311e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 172
Total TN 73286
Total FP 143
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 241
Total Scores
MCC 0.504
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.501 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.416
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3W1K_J 0.87 0.79 0.97 30 4155 1 1 0 0 8
3ZEX_C 0.39 0.27 0.56 14 14171 14 2 9 3 38
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 147
Total TN 73285
Total FP 175
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 266
Total Scores
MCC 0.430
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.525
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.35 0.64 7 1529 4 0 4 0 13
3J3E_8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7483 30 1 19 10 33
3J3F_8 0.34 0.33 0.35 12 12212 35 3 19 13 24
3W1K_J 0.84 0.74 0.97 28 4157 1 1 0 0 10
3ZEX_C 0.26 0.21 0.33 11 14163 35 2 20 13 41
4A1C_2 0.23 0.24 0.22 8 11744 35 8 21 6 25
4A1C_3 0.67 0.52 0.88 28 7108 4 0 4 0 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.19 0.38 8 4350 13 2 11 0 34
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.20 0.17 0.26 6 5128 17 2 15 0 30
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.