CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.509 > 0.355
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.509 ± 0.171 > 0.388 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.421 > 0.311
Positive Predictive Value 0.622 > 0.413
Total TP 168 > 124
Total TN 61040 > 61010
Total FP 135 < 207
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 20
Total FP INCONS 89 < 156
Total FP COMP 33 > 31
Total FN 231 < 275
P-value 1.52299983238e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 168
Total TN 61040
Total FP 135
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 33
Total FN 231
Total Scores
MCC 0.509
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.509 ± 0.171
Sensitivity 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.17 0.15 0.21 5 7479 28 2 17 9 28
3J3F_8 0.39 0.36 0.42 13 12215 32 2 16 14 23
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10
4FRN_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 20 5128 3 1 2 0 16
4JF2_A 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2831 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 61010
Total FP 207
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 156
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 275
Total Scores
MCC 0.355
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.388 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.311
Positive Predictive Value 0.413
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3J3E_8 0.06 0.06 0.08 2 7477 31 5 19 7 31
3J3F_8 0.33 0.33 0.33 12 12210 35 5 19 11 24
3RKF_A 0.75 0.65 0.88 22 2186 3 0 3 0 12
3SD1_A 0.11 0.10 0.15 4 3890 22 0 22 0 38
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4
4FRN_A 0.13 0.11 0.17 4 5128 19 2 17 0 32
4JF2_A 0.84 0.77 0.92 24 2824 2 1 1 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.